AI Conversation Intelligence

Know how you
come across.

Frame records, transcribes, and scores your conversations using emotional AI and rhetorical analysis. See what others hear.

Three inputs.
One score.

Every conversation runs through parallel AI systems that decode what you said, how you said it, and what it all means.

01
TRANSCRIBE

Speaker-separated transcription with precise timestamps. Know exactly who said what, and when.

02
ANALYZE

Neural prosody maps vocal tone across 48 emotion dimensions while rhetorical scoring evaluates substance, logic, and persuasion.

03
SCORE

A composite Frame Score fuses emotional presence with rhetorical command. One number. Complete clarity.

Every word.
Every metric.

Color-coded diarization with per-turn Frame, Prosody, and Rhetoric scores. See exactly where the conversation shifted.

TRANSCRIPT
[0:12] Speaker A
Look, the fusion approach gives us three times the throughput. I've run the numbers and it's not even close.
F:82 P:78 R:89 ASSERTIVE AGENDA_SETTING
[0:28] Speaker B
I mean, yeah, I guess. But that doesn't account for the migration cost. We'd need to rearchitect the whole pipeline.
F:51 P:44 R:61 HEDGING FILLER_HEAVY
[0:51] Speaker A
That's exactly why I'm proposing we do it now while the codebase is still manageable. Six months from now this conversation gets a lot harder.
F:91 P:85 R:93 SHARP MIC_DROP
[1:14] Speaker B
Okay, that's... a fair point. I hadn't thought about the timing angle.
F:38 P:35 R:44 GOT_COOKED
METRIC TIMELINE
100 75 50 25
FRAME
PROSODY
RHETORIC
SPEAKERS All A B
Ask it
anything.

An AI that has full context on your session — the transcript, the emotions, the rhetoric scores. Ask what went wrong, what worked, and how to do better next time.

"Like having a communication coach review every conversation with you."

👀 FRAME ANALYST
Where did I lose control of the negotiation?
At 0:28, when Speaker B challenged your timeline, you hesitated and used filler words ("I mean, yeah, I guess"). Your prosody dropped from 78 → 44 in that segment. Speaker B sensed the opening and pressed harder on migration costs.

The recovery at 0:51 was strong — you reframed with urgency and your rhetoric hit 93. That's the turn that broke Speaker B's frame.
How should I handle that differently next time?
When challenged on timeline, don't defend — reframe. Instead of hedging, flip it: "The question isn't whether we can afford to do it now — it's whether we can afford not to." Your rhetoric score on urgency framing was already 93. Lead with that instinct from the start.
Ask about this session...
One number.
Complete clarity.

Prosody meets rhetoric. Emotion meets logic. Your Frame Score is a weighted composite of how you sounded and what you said.

0
FRAME SCORE
PROSODY
78
RHETORIC
85
“The difference between a good conversation and a great one is awareness.”
Frame your
conversations.

Available on iOS. Free to start.

Download Frame